其實,馮乾晞講既,就有小小九唔搭八。
因為,當馮翁講到,「L離鄉不久,祖屋便被抄家,據堂兄後來轉告,抄家者有很多正是東江縱隊隊員。這些「抗日英雄」闖進L家中,指她全家是「地主惡霸」,二話不說就把他們「掃地出門」,男女老幼連一件衣服也不准拿走」,其實就同東江縰隊有冇份抗日,係冇咩關係既。
又不過,東江縱隊會抄你家,其實唔係奇事 -- 大佬,你睇我上面QUOTE栗裕回憶錄,游擊隊係三年游擊戰爭時,個「根據地建設的基本政策」係咩話﹖
米係「仍是继续贯彻土地革命的纲领,打土豪、分田地」。
即係,阿哥,老毛發表左湖南農民運動考察報告,究竟係講咩話﹖最出名既係﹕
革命不是請客吃飯,不是做文章,不是繪畫繡花,不能那樣雅致,那樣從容不迫,文質彬彬,那樣溫良恭儉讓。革命是暴動,是一個階級推翻一個階級的暴烈的行動。農村革命是農民階級推翻封建地主階級的權力的革命。農民若不用極大的力量,決不能推翻幾千年根深蒂固的地主權力。農村中須有一個大的革命熱潮,才能鼓動成千成萬的群眾,形成一個大的力量。
革命不是請客吃飯,不是做文章,不是繪畫繡花,不能那樣雅致,那樣從容不迫,文質彬彬,那樣溫良恭儉讓。革命是暴動,是一個階級推翻一個階級的暴烈的行動。農村革命是農民階級推翻封建地主階級的權力的革命。農民若不用極大的力量,決不能推翻幾千年根深蒂固的地主權力。農村中須有一個大的革命熱潮,才能鼓動成千成萬的群眾,形成一個大的力量。
所以,共產黨打游擊打抗戰,甚至之後去到國共內戰時期,其實土改都冇停過。例如,我前幾個POST就提到,老毛係1948年攪左個「新解放區土地改革要點」;早一年係1947年仲係西柏坡時,都攪左個「土地法大綱」。
咁你話,阿東江縱隊隊員將唔知係米「地主惡霸」「掃地出門」,又有幾奇怪﹖冇鬥地主,已經是仁慈鳥 -- 而香港係殖民地所以東江縱隊攪唔到土改,就好多人應該心存感激添啦。
*********
當然,講返正題。
東江縱隊究竟係抗日做過咩,就講黎講去都係個D啦。
阿縱隊係香港而家就紀念館片地開花,不過究竟有幾多人犧牲又殺左幾多日本仔,就真係,唔好問啦。
反正,好多野都可以各自詮釋既。
例如,馮乾晞唔記得幾時提過既 銀礦灣屠殺,最近大公文匯既標題係「銀礦灣慘案後人:日軍投降後還在屠殺」 (我唔比LINK啦)。你睇下,連阿國基都九唔搭八,走去睇衣個所謂既遺址。
The Judge Advocate observed the following.
“The case was long and involved the calling of many witnesses to identify the accused and establish individual acts of torture and maltreatment against such of them as were found guilty. There was no doubt that on 19 August 45 an attack was made on the Japanese garrison at Lantau by guerillas. There was however no evidence that this guerilla force was implemented or assisted by the villagers whom the Japanese subsequently arrested and executed. This incident occurred during the uneasy period between the Mikado’s speech and the formal surrender and while the Japanese were during this period entitled to defend themselves against attack, they were not entitled to execute anyone without trial, least of all innocent villagers. Accused 1 and 2 admitted having ordered these illegal executions and there was ample evidence before the court to identify such of the other accused as were convicted of torturing and maltreatment of the villagers. It is clear that accused 5 apart from carrying out some of the executions took a leading and enthusiastic part in organizing and inflicting the torture. The degree of culpability of the other accused is reflected in the sentences awarded by the Court.”
睇衣度既,都識英文架麻﹖咁佢講左衣兩句野,咁都知咩事啦﹕
There was no doubt that on 19 August 45 an attack was made on the Japanese garrison at Lantau by guerillas.
This incident occurred during the uneasy period between the Mikado’s speech and the formal surrender and while the Japanese were during this period entitled to defend themselves against attack, they were not entitled to execute anyone without trial, least of all innocent villagers.
即係,日本仔係冇權殺平民,衣個係war crime。不過,日本仔當時竟然有自衛權﹖當時又係咩人突然之間走去襲擊日本軍營呢﹖
你問陳國基啦。
至於而家大公文匯將件事包裝成抗戰阿愛國主義教育阿,就同央視點樣講 皖南事變阻止共產黨抗日一樣。
*********
當然,你睇WIKI,個銀礦灣屠殺就仲攪笑。為免唔知幾時比人改埋,我原文照COPY出黎﹕
銀礦灣屠殺發生於1945年香港大嶼山銀礦灣的香港日佔時期尾聲。8月15日日本宣佈向同盟國投降後,同盟國的大英帝國香港臨時政府署理總督詹遜委任駐港日軍在英軍抵達接管香港前繼續維持治安[1]。東江縱隊港九大隊於新界和離島進攻日軍據點,以奪取日軍武器。8月20日,負責梅窩治安的15名日軍梅窩警備隊(隸屬特設步兵第四大隊)被70名中共東江縱隊襲擊。[2][3]日軍懷疑附近的銀礦灣村民通敵,殺死至少9名村民,並俘虜300名村民,部份被俘村民被虐打。[3]香港重光後,1946-1948年香港軍事法庭將其中9名村民被殺案合併審理,3名日軍處死刑,另外10名日軍處2-10年監禁。[3]
沒有留言:
發佈留言